As the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) draws nearer to its implementation, recent details have shed light on how this new visa waiver scheme will function. Set to launch in spring 2025, ETIAS will require most UK citizens, as well as other non-EU nationals, to obtain a travel authorization at a cost of €7 (approximately £6) when visiting 30 countries across the European Union. Notably, travelers under 18 or over 70 years of age will be exempt from this fee.
This new requirement is scheduled to be introduced six months after the European Union rolls out the delayed Entry/Exit System (EES) on November 10, 2024. While ETIAS is expected to streamline the process of entering EU countries, there are still numerous questions and concerns about how it will operate in practice.
Addressing Concerns: How Will ETIAS Work for Travelers with Complex Backgrounds?
One of the significant concerns surrounding ETIAS is its potential impact on individuals with complex travel histories, such as those with criminal records or those who have visited conflict zones or countries viewed unfavorably by the EU. There is also speculation about whether being denied ETIAS approval might prevent individuals from obtaining any other type of visa.
The ETIAS application will require travelers to submit personal information, including their name, address, passport details, and occupation. Additionally, applicants will be asked about their travel history to conflict zones and any criminal convictions. According to available information, each application will be assessed on an individual basis, considering various factors specific to the applicant’s circumstances.
While ETIAS applications are not yet open, the questions on the EU’s official website resemble those asked when applying for the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), which is required for non-visa travel to the United States.
What Happens if ETIAS is Refused?
If an ETIAS application is refused, applicants will be provided with a reason for the refusal and information on how to appeal the decision. However, the appeal process will be managed by the individual EU member state that issued the refusal, and not by the European Commission.
Statewatch, an organization monitoring civil liberties in the EU, has expressed concerns about the transparency and fairness of the ETIAS refusal process. According to Chris Jones, Director of Statewatch, even those flagged by the system due to past convictions or travel to certain regions may still have their applications approved, as the final decision is made by officials in the ETIAS National Units of each member state.
Transparency and Concerns About the ETIAS System
Despite assurances from the EU that interviews and additional documentation requests will be rare and conducted only in “exceptional circumstances,” there are ongoing concerns about the potential for discrimination and profiling within the ETIAS system. Critics argue that the new system could exacerbate existing issues of racial and discriminatory profiling at EU borders, as well as lead to longer wait times and additional scrutiny for travelers flagged by automated systems.
Jones also highlighted the broader implications of the ETIAS and similar systems, suggesting that while travelers face increased data collection and potential delays, the primary beneficiaries of these new measures are likely to be the police, border forces, and private corporations involved in developing and maintaining the ETIAS infrastructure.
The UK’s Approach: A Different Path?
As the UK works on developing its own system akin to ETIAS, there are suggestions that it would be prudent to learn from the EU’s challenges and consider a different approach. With the complexities and potential pitfalls of the ETIAS system coming to light, UK authorities may seek to implement a more transparent and traveler-friendly process.
In summary, while ETIAS aims to simplify travel to the EU for non-EU nationals, including UK citizens, it raises important questions about privacy, fairness, and the impact on travelers with more complicated backgrounds. As the launch date approaches, travelers and advocacy groups alike will be watching closely to see how these issues are addressed.